What Customer Service Level Is Acceptable?
Friday, February 1st, 2008
Does the channel or business model make any difference to the level of acceptable customer service?
Jeremy writes that online stores should not bother with an extensive customer support service and offer a simple return service only. I.e. if you don’t like it, send it back.
In my opinion, it depends on a number of factors…
- How competitive is the market?
- Is your business model cut price self service or luxury?
- Is the item a low value commodity or a high value purchase?
- What channel are you using for the sale?
- Are you hoping for an ongoing customer relationship?
In the case of an online store - the majority of the work involved in achieving the sale and completing the order is automated. The customer can browse the store without a member of staff checking whether they need help or if they are shoplifting. Detailed product information and even reviews or customer feedback is available to help the customer with the decision. The purchase processing is automated, confirmation emails and estimated delivery dates or tracking can be automated. And depending on the nature and set-up, much of the logistics can be automated.
So when customer has a query - I would be inclined to agree with Jeremy - it may be simpler to continue the theme. With an automatically generated returns slip and refund procedure.
On the other hand - a retail store would need to staff a store with a number of people to complete a sale, so whereas a customer services team would need to be specifically employed if you wanted to offer support for an online sale, the existing retail staff needed for the original sale could help with queries - as long as they were trained correctly.
The customer expects different service levels based on the positioning of your brand - in his podcast, Steve Humphrey describes the decision making process and different levels of service required depending on the nature of the purchase. He uses the comparison of buying at Primark compared to Prada.
Customers also expect different service levels if buying a high value product - for example a car. Even in the case of online ordering, you would expect a certain amount of aftersales service.
Marks and Spencer offered a no quibble exchange policy regardless of how long ago the purchase was made, this was promoted as a selling point in the past.
This has now changed to a 90 day return policy for unwanted goods - presumably to reduce exploitation and cut costs.
Jason from good customer services blog suggests that the level of service you provide in retail stores depends also on your behaviour. I would agree that sales staff are likely to be happier to go the extra mile for polite customers.
Let me know your experiences -
- Have you been surprised by exceptionally good or bad service?
- Do you think companies should be able to get away with low customer service if they offer a lower priced product?
- Would a return only policy please you or is it not enough?
- What customer service do you offer?
- Have you seen examples of customers exploiting good customer service?
Listen to Steve’s Marketing podcast using this link - I would recommend episode 13 The decision making process, and 7 The Marketing Mix and the scope of Marketing.

I read an excellent example of how good customer service training can change the outcome of a bad customer experience. The example was written on the
Call centres throughout the UK are one of the busiest working environments and yet they are also very high on the list when it comes to training needs. Because the people employed in the call centres are coming into contact with the general public it is essential that their training needs are identified and then met by good quality and well delivered training courses that actually provide the skill sets required. Beyond The Box Ltd was commissioned by Comet to identify the training needs of its call centre staff and then to design a training programme that would cover all three levels of sales staff expertise – entry level, mid level and expert level.